talón The NIST Standards: A Deep Dive into CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium – Securities.io
Contáctenos

Finanzas cuánticas seguras

Los estándares del NIST: un análisis profundo de CRYSTALS-Kyber y Dilithium

mm

Securities.io mantiene rigurosos estándares editoriales y podría recibir una compensación por los enlaces revisados. No somos asesores de inversiones registrados y esto no constituye asesoramiento de inversión. Consulte nuestra divulgación de afiliados.

Una estructura reticular geométrica fotorrealista de alta dimensión que brilla con luz iridiscente, centrada en un círculo de HUD digital y superposiciones de circuitos. El fondo presenta un paisaje urbano nocturno difuminado, que representa la implementación de complejos estándares criptográficos en una infraestructura financiera global.

Navegación de la serie: Parte 1 de 6 en El manual de finanzas cuánticas seguras

Summary: The New Standards

  • NIST has finalized the first three global standards for post-quantum cryptography, providing a clear roadmap for securing digital assets.
  • ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber) is the primary standard for general encryption and secure key exchange.
  • ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium) serves as the primary standard for digital signatures and identity verification.
  • These algorithms are based on lattice mathematics, which is designed to be unsolvable by both classical and quantum processors.

Atoms for Algorithms: The Standardization of PQC

For decades, the global financial system has relied on RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography to secure data. However, the arrival of quantum computing has made these methods vulnerable. In response, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initiated a global competition to find replacements. In late 2024, it released the final versions of the first three standards: FIPS 203, FIPS 204, and FIPS 205.

This milestone transitioned post-quantum cryptography from a theoretical field into a commercial requirement. For investors and institutions, understanding these specific algorithms is essential, as they now form the bedrock of the new quantum-safe perimeter.

ML-KEM: The Standard for General Encryption

FIPS 203 specifies the Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism, known as ML-KEM. Originally developed under the name CRYSTALS-Kyber, this algorithm is designed for two parties to establish a shared secret key over a public network. This key is then used with symmetric encryption to protect the actual data transmission.

ML-KEM was selected due to its exceptional performance and relatively small key sizes. It is efficient enough to be used in everything from high-speed data center links to resource-constrained IoT devices. IBM was a primary contributor to its development, ensuring that the algorithm could handle the massive throughput required by modern enterprise stacks.

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM + 4.04%)

ML-DSA: The Standard for Digital Signatures

While ML-KEM protects the “envelope” of the data, FIPS 204 protects the “identity” of the sender. The Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA), formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium, is the primary standard for digital signatures. It ensures that a document, transaction, or software update has not been altered and truly originated from the claimed source.

ML-DSA is intended to replace the digital signature schemes currently used in X.509 certificates and secure web browsing (TLS). Its implementation is critical for the banking sector, where the integrity of a transaction is as important as its confidentiality.

The Backup: SLH-DSA

NIST also finalized FIPS 205, which specifies the Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (SLH-DSA). Unlike the lattice-based approach of ML-KEM and ML-DSA, this algorithm is based on hash functions. It is intended as a conservative backup. If a future breakthrough were to compromise lattice-based math, SLH-DSA would remain secure, providing a critical layer of algorithmic diversity for the financial system.

The Technical Comparison: Performance and Security

Estándar Nombre anterior Caso de uso principal Base matemática
FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) CRISTALES-Kyber Cifrado de clave pública Module-Lattice
FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) CRISTALES-Dilithium Firmas digitales Module-Lattice
FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA) SPHINCS + Backup Signatures Basado en hash

Implementation Challenges: Key Size and Complexity

While these new standards are highly secure, they are more computationally demanding than the systems they replace. Lattice-based keys and signatures are larger than those used in elliptic curve cryptography. This means that hardware security modules (HSMs) and network protocols must be updated to handle the increased data load without introducing latency.

Companies like Amazon and Google have already begun integrating these standards into their cloud infrastructure to provide a quantum-safe environment for their clients. For the financial sector, the transition involves a complex inventory of every cryptographic asset in the organization—a process known as achieving cryptographic agility.

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN + 0.33%)

To understand how these standards are being applied to protect the global movement of capital, see Part 2: Quantum-Safe Banking & The Re-architecture of Swift.

Conclusión

The finalization of the NIST standards has provided the definitive playbook for the quantum-safe era. By establishing ML-KEM and ML-DSA as the global benchmarks, NIST has allowed the financial industry to move from the research phase into the implementation phase. These algorithms now serve as the first line of defense in the multi-trillion dollar effort to secure the digital future.

El manual de finanzas cuánticas seguras

Este artículo es Parte 1 of our comprehensive guide to the quantum-safe transition.

Explora la serie completa:

Daniel es un gran defensor de cómo blockchain acabará alterando las grandes finanzas. Respira tecnología y vive para probar nuevos gadgets.

Divulgación anunciante: Securities.io está comprometido con estándares editoriales rigurosos para brindar a nuestros lectores reseñas y calificaciones precisas. Es posible que recibamos una compensación cuando hace clic en enlaces a productos que revisamos.

ESMA: Los CFD son instrumentos complejos y conllevan un alto riesgo de perder dinero rápidamente debido al apalancamiento. Entre el 74% y el 89% de las cuentas de inversores minoristas pierden dinero al operar con CFD. Debe considerar si comprende cómo funcionan los CFD y si puede permitirse el lujo de correr el alto riesgo de perder su dinero.

Descargo de responsabilidad sobre consejos de inversión: La información contenida en este sitio web se proporciona con fines educativos y no constituye asesoramiento de inversión.

Descargo de responsabilidad de riesgo comercial: Existe un grado muy alto de riesgo involucrado en la negociación de valores. Negociar con cualquier tipo de producto financiero, incluidos Forex, CFD, acciones y criptomonedas.

Este riesgo es mayor con las criptomonedas debido a que los mercados están descentralizados y no regulados. Debe tener en cuenta que puede perder una parte importante de su cartera.

Securities.io no es un corredor, analista o asesor de inversiones registrado.