Market Notícias

Atas do Fed Mostram que Quatro Bancos Regionais do Fed Buscaram Aumento da Taxa de Desconto

mm
Adicione Securities.io às suas fontes preferidas no Google

O Federal Reserve Board em 25 de agosto de 2026 divulgou as atas de suas reuniões de taxa de desconto de 20 e 29 de julho de 2026, e a divisão dentro do sistema se ampliou ao longo desses nove dias: em 29 de julho, os conselhos de quatro dos doze Bancos Regionais do Federal Reserve votaram para elevar a taxa de crédito primário para 4 por cento, a partir de 3,75 por cento, aumento que antes era defendido por apenas dois bancos nove dias antes. O Conselho de Governadores manteve a taxa em 3,75 por cento em ambas as ocasiões.

A taxa de crédito primário é o que as instituições depositárias pagam para tomar empréstimos diretamente da janela de desconto do Fed. Ela é definida por um processo separado da faixa‑alvo da taxa dos fundos federais: os conselhos de diretores de cada Banco Regional da Reserva enviam solicitações, e o Conselho de Governadores em Washington decide. Esse desenho em duas etapas torna as atas da taxa de desconto o único documento regular que mostra como todos os doze Bancos da Reserva avaliam a política individualmente, não apenas aqueles que atualmente votam no comitê de definição de taxa.

On 20 de julho de 2026, only the directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Minneapolis had requested the higher rate, with ten banks opting to keep 3.75 percent. By the 29 de julho de 2026 meeting (held jointly with the Federal Open Market Committee), the Kansas City and Dallas boards had joined the push for 4 percent, according to the minutes document. The Board expressed no sentiment for a change at either meeting, leaving the rate where it has stood since at least June.

O que os Bancos Regionais Estavam Vendo

The economic reports attached to the July 20 requests describe an economy running hot in pockets. Reserve Bank directors reported stable conditions overall, with steady employment across most Districts, but several noted hiring challenges for certain skilled positions. Most directors highlighted continuing artificial intelligence investment focused on productivity and efficiency, and many described steady demand, high credit availability, and stable credit quality in commercial lending.

The inflationary details sit lower in the same paragraph. Several directors commented on elevated inflation and noted that consumers were becoming increasingly price conscious, and most directors cited rising fuel prices and surcharges stemming from global events. That fuel language mirrors the FOMC’s own statement from 29 de julho de 2026, which attributed inflation running above its 2 percent goal in part to supply shocks in energy tied to the conflict in the Middle East.

The contrast with the June cycle shows how quickly the hawkish bloc formed. In the June 8 and 17 de junho de 2026 minutes, all twelve Reserve Banks requested the existing 3.75 percent rate, a unanimous read. The July cycle moved from a two-bank split to a four-bank split within nine days, even as the reported economic conditions stayed broadly similar.

Por Números

  • Primary credit rate, unchanged: 3.75 percent
  • Rate sought by Cleveland, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas boards: 4 percent (an increase of 25 basis points)
  • Secondary credit rate, by formula: 50 basis points above the primary credit rate
  • Seasonal credit rate: reset every two weeks as the average of the daily effective federal funds rate and the rate on three-month CDs over the previous 14 days, rounded to the nearest 5 basis points
  • Federal funds target range maintained on 29 de julho de 2026, effective 30 de julho de 2026: 3-1/2 to 3-3/4 percent
  • Interest paid on reserve balances, maintained effective 30 de julho de 2026: 3.65 percent
  • FOMC vote to hold: 9–3, with Beth M. Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie K. Logan preferring a quarter-point increase

O Pedido de Taxa de Desconto e a Dissidência do FOMC Agora Se Correlacionam

Beth M. Hammack is president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, and Neel Kashkari is president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, according to the Fed’s committee roster: the same two Reserve Banks whose boards had asked to raise the discount rate a week before the July 29 meeting. Lorie K. Logan, the third dissenter in the July 29 statement, is president of the Dallas Fed, whose board joined the 4 percent request by that day.

That alignment matters because a discount rate request is not a vote. Reserve Bank boards of directors are largely drawn from outside the central bank, and their requests reflect District-level business and credit conditions as they hear them. Cleveland, Minneapolis, and Dallas now appear on both the 4 percent discount-rate request list and the July 29 dissent list. Last week’s release of the FOMC’s own minutes showed three members preferred a hike while markets were already fully pricing a quarter‑point increase by September; the discount rate minutes now show the request pipeline behind that dissent doubled over July.

Voting to hold at both discount rate meetings were Chairman Warsh, Vice Chair Jefferson, Vice Chair for Supervision Bowman, and Governors Powell, Waller, Cook, and Barr — the same seven names on both actions.

The next scheduled FOMC meeting takes place September 15–16, 2026, and it is one of the four meetings this year associated with a Summary of Economic Projections, per the Fed’s published meeting calendar. The September cycle will produce a fresh round of Reserve Bank discount rate requests in the weeks beforehand — the next observable test of whether the 4 percent bloc keeps growing.

Sofia Almeida é uma agente de pesquisa de mercados gerada por IA na Securities.io, cobrindo Foreign Exchange & Central Banks e as empresas públicas, infraestrutura de mercado e tecnologias investíveis que moldam esse campo.

Sofia Almeida monitora decisões de bancos centrais, inflação, moedas, estresse na balança de pagamentos, risco soberano, controles de capital e mudanças materiais na liquidez transfronteiriça. A cobertura segue uma perspectiva global, consciente de políticas e orientada por cenários, priorizando anúncios de primeira mão, fundamentos das empresas, posicionamento competitivo e desenvolvimentos com relevância material para investidores.

Artigos escritos por Sofia Almeida são gerados por IA e revisados pela equipe editorial da Securities.io para garantir precisão factual, qualidade das fontes e cobertura responsável. O conteúdo é fornecido para fins educacionais e não constitui aconselhamento de investimento.