A Brief Look at Stablecoins
We focus primarily on digital securities, here at Securities.io. However, there is another notable trend in the world of blockchain, which is often intertwined with this new asset class. This would be the rapidly growing world of ‘stablecoins’.
These stablecoins have inherent qualities that appeal to participants involved with digital securities. This makes them attractive to both issuers, and investors alike.
So what exactly is it about stablecoins that makes them attractive to investors? The reasons vary in every case, but the following traits are the most obvious benefits these tokens afford.
- As these assets are blockchain based, anyone can view transactional history, since this data is stored on public ledgers. These inside looks can be obtained through use of various ‘block explorers’.
- While FIAT transfers are at the mercy of banks, and often take a lengthy amount of time to be approved, stablecoins benefit from a lack of middle-men. Large and small denominations alike are able to be transferred directly between two parties. There are no holding periods.
- Building on the point made above, the lack of middle-men in a transaction is a good thing. This is one less mouth that needs to be fed. The result of this is lower transaction fees, as there is no need to pay a cut to a bank.
- This is undoubtedly the largest draw for many towards stablecoins. The entire foundation of the idea they are built upon, is to provide their holder with financial stability. This is afforded to the hold by ‘pegging’ the stablecoin to a traditionally non-volatile asset. This most often means national currencies, such as USD, CAD, FRANC, EUR, etc. Although, there are various instances of stablecoins being pegged to commodities such as maple syrup, gold, and more.
These qualities also just happen to appeal to those involved in digital securities, leading investors to see the appeal of both. Digital securities are a means of taking part in the world of blockchain, while ensuring compliance with regulations. The results are investment opportunities that are more predictable, and backed by real world assets- both traits offered by stablecoins.
While the points noted above may sound fantastic when applied to a financial asset, they are not givens. These point are strived for, but not always attained. For example, it was recently verified that industry leading stablecoin, ‘Tether’, does not maintain 1:1 reserves of USD in their accounts.
While this has long been suspected by many involved in the world of cryptocurrencies, it has only now been verified in an affidavit signed by a lawyer working with Tether. The following is a brief excerpt from this recent statement.
“Tether has cash and cash equivalents (short term securities) on hand totaling approximately $2.1 billion, representing approximately 74 percent of the current outstanding tethers.”
The Story Thus Far
To elaborate on the sticky situation in which Tether finds themselves, the New York General Attorney recently issued a statement condemning the company’s practices. In these statements, it was said that Tether reserves were used by sister company, BitFinex, to cover losses of investor funds – coming in to the tune of roughly $900 million. It is believed that, not only did these actions take place, but they were intentionally hid from the public.
In the days following these statements, BitFinex has denied any wrong-doing, and indicates that they have not lost any funds. They were, rather, locked-up by their payment processer, Panama based, Crypto Capital, due to an inability to prove ownership.
The point in raising awareness to this story, is that the status as the ‘go-to’ stable coin, held by Tether, is tenuous at best. Now is the time for any contenders to step up and usurp Tether in their bid for dominance; a dominance that may be achieved by cozying up with the world of digital securities.
The situation continues to unfold as the investigation continues.
Some have noted that there is a common denominator seen in, both the unfolding Tether situation, and that of embattled Canadian exchange, QuadrigaCX; this would be payment processer Crypto Capital.
Much of the woes experienced by both Tether and QuadrigaCX stem from each having significant sums of money ‘locked-up’. In time, investigators hope to shed more light on how each of these companies found themselves in their respective situations, and whether Crypto Capital has played a role in the demise of each.
Despite the recent woes of industry leading, Tether, stablecoins appear to have as bright a future as ever. Various companies have, both, recognized this, and contributed towards it being true. While options are plentiful, a few offerings stand out from the pack as viable replacements for Tether.
Each of these four stablecoins are products of mother company, TrustToken. All of these tokens are backed 1:1 by each’s respective FIAT currency. TrueUSD, in particular, has seen high levels of adoption, and can actively be traded on a variety exchanges, such as Bittrex, Binance, UpBit, and more.
TrustToken is a promising company which specializes in the tokenization of real-world assets. While TrustToken can be used to tokenize assets such as real-estate, art, and more, it is their implementation, with regards to stablecoins pegged to various FIAT currencies, which has caught the attention of many.
A product of Gemini exchange, Gemini Dollar (GUSD), is another token backed on a 1:1 ratio by USD. The purpose of this stablecoin is to provide investors with an asset that behaves in a predictable manner like USD, but benefits form the inherent qualities of blockchain. This stablecoin is based on the ERC-20 standard, meaning that it functions on the Ethereum blockchain.
This particular stablecoin touts itself as the first of its kind to be regulated. This regulation comes in the form of monthly audits by accounting firms, custody provided by State Street Bank and Trust Company, and through licensing granted to Gemini by the State of New York.
Adoption, thus far, has resulted in GUSD being traded on a variety of exchanges, in addition to establishing partnerships with tokenizing platforms such as Harbor.
Circle is a United States based company which has made headlines over the past two years through their purchase of Poloniex, and public statements indicating an eventual foray into digital securities. Along the way, Circle has noted both digital securities and stablecoins as growing trends, and sought to take part. This resulted in the creation of USD Coin (USDC).
As its name implies, this Ethereum based asset is pegged to the US dollar at a 1:1 ratio. The goal is to provide its holders with a means for maintaining consistent buying power, in an industry known for its volatility.
Recent adoption has seen Securitize announce their support of USDC through their industry leading tokenization services.
It is important to remember that these are only three of the most viable alternatives to Tether. More offerings are popping up every day, and none have attained #1 status, or any semblance of dominance. As the situation with Tether unfolds, watch closely as the markets react and begin turning to rival stablecoins.
With development of digital securities booming, and a sky-high ceiling for the sector, perhaps the best indicator of which stablecoin stands to inherit Tether’s crown, is the one which sees the most adoption in the burgeoning sector.
Equity Tokens vs Security Tokens
Learning the differences between equity tokens vs security tokens is a smart way to better your overall crypto investment strategy. While most crypto investors are familiar with traditional utility tokens such as Ethereum, both security, and equity tokens are fairly new to the space. These tokens vary from utility tokens in many different ways.
Protect Your Investment
Different tokens have different legal regulations. Currently, equity, debt, and security tokens fall under standard securities transaction laws, whereas, utility, currency, and asset tokens do not require SEC approval. Let’s take a moment to examine some key differences between equity tokens vs security tokens.
Know the Difference – Security Tokens
According to the SEC, one can perform the “Howey Test” to determine if a token falls under securities regulations. The Howie test is a series of questions that include:
- Did You Invest Money?
- Do You Expect Profit?
- Did You Invest in a Common Enterprise?
- Are Profits dependent on a Third-parties Effort?
If you answer yes to these questions, you are investing in a security token. Security token holders do not have any ownership rights to the entity they invested in. Instead, they are guaranteed a percentage of the profits generated from the entity. Security tokens come in many forms:
- Digital Mutual Funds
- Digital ETFs
- Non-equity Investments Against Capital
Additionally, security tokens cannot be transferred without meeting certain regulations. These regulations include AML and KYC requirements. This makes security tokens less liquidable than their utility token counterparts that can be traded anonymously.
Notable Security Token Platforms
There are a number of notable security token platforms operating in the cryptospace today. Polymath, Securitize, and Harbor are three of the most established platforms available today. Each offers enterprise users an easy option to issue and maintain security tokens.
Security Token Protocols
Security tokens contain their regulatory compliance directly within their protocol. By including these regulations in the tokens smart contract, security token issuers can guarantee their product remains compliant throughout all stages of its lifecycle. Below are the most popular security token protocols currently in use.
ERC-1400 / ERC-1404
The ERC-1400 entered the market in December 2018. This protocol is the brainchild of Polymath’s development team and Stephane Gosselin. Develops knew that if they could utilize a varied ERC-20 protocol that this would allow for the greatest amount of interoperability within the market. The ERC-20 protocol is by far the most widely used utility token issuance standard available.
The team sought to create a security token standard that could function on the Ethereum blockchain. Additionally, the team wanted a protocol that contained no partitions. Today, the ERC-1400 standard is used by many firms globally.
ST-20 – Polymath
Polymath took their concept a step further when they created the ST-20 protocol. The ST-20 token standard functions similar to the ERC-1400 but with one main advantage, ST-20 tokens are able to remain compliant when traded on decentralized exchanges (DEX). Polymath proved this theory earlier in the month via a test with the DEX Loopring.
DS-Token – Securitize
The DS-token standard is the brainchild of the popular token issuance platform Securitize. Securitize utilizes a Compliance Service to ensure that their tokens are handled in a legal manner. The tokens must get approval from this on-chain registry to verify investor status before executing any trades. This means all DS-token holders have an identifying hash.
Secondary market compliance continues to be a hot button topic in the industry. Just this month, the DTCC released a paper outlining how these secondary market concerns need to be addressed to ensure fair market practices. Currently, the DTCC is the third-party custodial exchange for traditional securities markets. The firm replaced the old paper transfer methods used in the 1970s. Last year, the DTCC handled over four-quadrillion in securities transactions in the US alone.
Equity tokens function more like a traditional stock asset. In other words, equity token holders possess some form of ownership in their investments. Their tokens represent how much ownership percentage they actually have. In most instances, equity tokens represent a third-party asset, property, or venture. Equity tokens come in many forms:
- Options Contracts
- Tokenized Real Estate
- Tokenized Ventures
Equity tokens continue to see the most use in real estate crowdfunding platforms such as Atlant. These platforms allow investors to spread their funds more freely across the market. Real estate equity tokens represent a share of ownership in a particular property. This strategy enables investors to join multiple investments with less capital. Additionally, these platforms lower the entry bar for real estate investments and facilitate more market activity.
Equity Tokens vs Security Tokens Standards
Currently, equity tokens share the same protocols as security tokens, but in the near future, you can expect to see equity token specific standards emerge. For the time being, security token protocols can perform all the necessary functions required by equity tokens. Additionally, ERC-based equity tokens gain a bit more interoperability when compared to what a future equity token standard might include.
Notable Equity Token Projects
One of the most publicized equity token projects entered the market in October 2018 under the name Media Shower. The Media Shower platform enables companies to create and issue equity tokens. Speaking on the venture, Media Shower’s CEO, John Hargrave explained how the concept opens the doors for new investment opportunities on all levels.
SEC vs ICO
The SEC started cracking down on the ICO market in 2017 after it revealed that it believed that most offerings were really tokenized securities. Failure to seek SEC approval when dealing with security tokens can result in hefty fines and even jail time. Since that time, there have been multiple highly publicized cases, with many currently underway.
In most instances, the SEC went after these firms for selling securities illegally. Company officials paid fines and were forced to return investors funds. In one instance, a company by the name of Gladius was able to avoid major fines by self-reporting their ICO. Consequently, the firm returned all investor funds as part of the deal.
Equity vs Security Tokens – Brothers from Another Mother
Each token type provides you with a unique investment opportunity. Be sure to consider your options fully. Also, always keep in mind that both equity and security tokens require approval prior to any transactions. These requirements can affect your ability to trade these tokens in the secondary market.
More to Come
For now, the cryptospace continues to grow as the advantages of blockchain technology continue to be better understood by traditional investment firms. You can expect to see more standards and token types emerge as these trends continue.
Utility Tokens vs Security Tokens
As a responsible crypto investor, you must understand the differences between utility tokens vs security tokens. These tokens serve different purposes in the cryptospace. Their processes differ during trading and issuance. These contrasts make security tokens unique to their utility counterparts.
Why Do We Have Security Tokens?
The ICO market continues to expand. According to a report from Business Insider, companies raised over $5.6 billion in 2017. While this number seems impressive, the ICO activity of this year already eclipsed it. By May 2018, the ICO market expanded to $6.3 billion. This record growth and the growing appeal of ICOs makes this unique crowdfunding strategy a favorite among tech startups.
The record growth of the ICO sector led to increased scrutiny from regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The task of developing regulations for the growing ICO market falls on this organization depending on how the token’s use. The SEC decided that when a token represents ownership, voting rights, or entitles the holder to share of future profits, it’s a security token.
Utility Tokens vs Security Tokens – How can I Tell the Difference
It isn’t always that easy to determine if a coin is a security or utility token. In many instances, a token starts off as a security during an ICO but later evolves into a utility token. This scenario is the case for the hugely popular cryptocurrency Ethereum (ETH). In a June ruling, the SEC determined that Ethereum operated as a security initially, but today it’s a utility token.
To make matters more complicated, a utility token such as ETH can have security tokens issued on its platform. Ethereum’s ERC-20 protocol is the most popular token launching protocol in the cryptospace. New tokens issued on the platform are security tokens if they fail the “Howey Test.”
The “Howey Test” is a brief questionnaire created by the Supreme Court for determining whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract. The test became famous during the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC V. Howey. The case revolved around a Howey, Florida-based orange juice company that offered large parts of its land for sale to investors with the intent of having the new owners lease the property back to the citrus developer, who would continue developing the area with the newly acquired funds.
The SEC sued the defendants in this transaction for violating the Securities regulations. The SEC determined that because the investors put forth funds in the hopes of making a profit from the efforts of the citrus farm, the deal was an investment contract. Therefore, the agreement falls under securities regulations.
The Supreme Court developed a simple test to prove the theory. The Howey Test asks investors four critical questions. These questions can be applied to tokens to determine if they are security tokens:
- Are You are Investing Money?
- Do You Expect Profits from Your Investment?
- Are You Investing in A Common Enterprise?
- Will You Profit from the Efforts of a Promoter or Third Party?
Utility tokens serve a use within a platform. In most cases, companies host ICOs to issue utility tokens. These tokens are essential to the functionality of their platforms. Additionally, they do not give token holders rights to the company’s future development or profits. These tokens transfer without regulations, and any company can offer utility tokens without meeting SEC regulations. The open nature of these tokens made them a favorite amongst investors and startups.
Security tokens operate in a much different manner, and under different requirements. A company cannot just host a security token offering (STO) without fulfilling specific conditions. Companies must provide investors with a plethora of information including the company’s actual address, the names of all board members, and open financial records. These requirements protect investors from fraudulent activity.
On top of the company regulations, investors meet stringent security regulations as well. Companies cannot sell security tokens to anonymous individuals. You will need to provide and prove your identity when investing in these tokens. Know Your Customer (KYC), and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws must be adhered to when moving security tokens between owners.
Added Security – Added Investment Funds
While some early crypto investors undoubtedly see security tokens as a burden on the cryptospace, many believe these tokens to provide an essential bridge between traditional investment funds and the cryptomarket. Analysts have predicted a rise in traditional investment firms entering the cryptospace.
These firms require added protection due to the substantial nature of their investments. Security tokens provide them with the protections they need to avoid future financial and legal problems.
Utility Tokens vs Security Tokens
Now that you better understand the differences between these tokens, you are ready to comprehend STOs and what makes them different than their ICO counterparts. Security tokens play an important, and ever-growing, role in the cryptospace. You should expect more platforms entering the cryptomarket using this type of token over the coming months.
How Do Smart Contracts Work?
Smart contracts enable automation of certain aspects of a platform’s functionality. These digital agreements self-execute predetermined actions upon receiving a digital asset or cryptocurrency. Today, smart contracts are used everywhere in the blockchain space, but this wasn’t always the case. Let’s take a second to examine how these helpful protocols first came to be, and how they function without the need for any third-party intervention.
The original smart contract concept predates cryptocurrencies by fourteen years. Ironically, the man credited with developing smart contracts is no other than well-known Bitcoinist Nick Szabo. Many people believe Nick to actually be Satoshi Nakamoto because of his previous works.
Nick famously theorized about value-storing bits utilizing a proof-of-work system five years before Bitcoin existed. He has always been a pioneer in the cryptospace. In 1994, Nick released his smart contract code to the public. He also coined the phrase “smart contract”.
What Do I Need to Create a Smart Contract?
Every smart contract contains four core principals. First, you need the subject of the contract. The subject is what gives your contract access to the goods or services that the contract governs. Second, you need digital signatures (private keys) from everyone involved in the contract. These signatures are what initiates the contract. Next, comes specification of the contract terms. This part is where you lay out the exact sequence of operations that commence when the contract executes. Finally, you need a decentralized platform. A blockchain network keeps the smart contract stored in redundancy and safe from alterations.
Smart Contract Components
- Subject of Contract
- Digital Signatures
- Contract Terms
- Decentralized Platform
How Do People Use Smart Contracts?
There are endless smart contract uses. Smart contracts help you to exchange digital and real-world assets. Smart contracts live on the blockchain and cannot be altered. This added security makes these digital agreements ideal for many business scenarios.
Smart Contracts in ICOs
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) utilize smart contract protocols during their crowdfunding events. The smart contracts automatically track, calculate, award, and distribute the funds sent between the company and the investor. The smart contract programming enables the automation of the entire process.
This automation allows companies to accept funding from a wider audience. The workload of the company is not increased, but the company’s fundraising exposure expands. The all-inclusive nature of this strategy helped push ICOs to record numbers this year. One report shows that ICO volume already doubled lasts year’s numbers by May.
Traditional Firms Look Towards Smart Contracts
Traditional firms continue entering the smart contract arena as blockchain integration continues. Today, platforms exist that utilize smart contracts for nearly everything including real estate, investments, royalties, elections, logistics, and much more.
Ethereum – Smart Contracts
The cryptocurrency, Ethereum, is best known for introducing the smart contract concept to the cryptospace. Ethereum’s ERC-20 protocol utilizes smart contracts to help automate token creation and distribution. ERC-20 is by far, the most widely used token issuance protocol in the market.
Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s developer describes smart contracts as a program that “automatically validates a condition and determines whether the asset should go to one person or back to the person who sent it or some combination.” Ethereum utilizes a second-layer protocol to accomplish smart contract capabilities without creating additional blockchain congestion.
Smart Contract Development
Since Ethereum raised smart contract awareness, more complex and advanced smart contract models entered the cryptospace. Platforms such as EOS, Steller, and NEO utilize less wasteful consensus mechanisms when compared to the Proof-of-Work system in place with Ethereum.
Say Good Bye to Lawyers
Smart contracts are removing the middleman from many of the most used business systems today. The trustless nature of these protocols allows businesses and investors the ability to increase efficiency and security simultaneously. You should expect further integration of this technology into traditional business systems as more platforms enter the market.
- Blockport STO Fails to Gain Traction – Platform to Shutdown May 18, 2019
- BitBond Opens Bounty Program for Live Security Token Offering May 18, 2019
- Poloniex Cleans House as Tokens Delisted for Fear of Being Called Securities May 18, 2019
- Blockstream to Add Support for Digital Securities on Liquid Security Platform May 17, 2019
- OpenFinance Brings Support State-side for Third Party Digital Securities May 17, 2019