Connect with us

Security Tokens

Investing in Kentucky Bourbon with Wave Financial

mm

Published

 on

bourbon

Tokenizing Drink

Investors will soon be able to gain exposure to a new type of asset through an upcoming fund – Whiskey/Bourbon backed digital securities.

This endeavour is being undertaken by a trio of companies – Wilderness Trail Distillery, Wave Financial, and Vertalo.  While the distillery will provide the product, Vertalo will provide the tech for tokenization, with Wave facilitating, and managing, the fund.

Naturally, as these Whiskey backed tokens function as digital securities, they are subject to strict compliance measures.  Among other things, this means that only accredited investors may participate in the sale, and the tokens must be placed in an SEC enforced 1 year moratorium.

While Wave has not released any details surrounding future markets for trading, they indicate that they are in talks with various secondary exchanges.  Ideally, investors will see their tokens supported on a variety of exchanges, upon being freed in 1 year.

Wave Kentucky Whiskey 2020 Digital Fund

This opportunity being afforded to investors is being called the ‘Wave Kentucky Whiskey 2020 Digital Fund’.

The following are a few details surrounding the fund.

  • Up to 25,000 barrels
    • Equates up to 4 million bottles of bourbon
    • Worth up to $20 million
  • Stored and maintained by the distillery
  • Value calculated quarterly

While returns can never be guaranteed, Wave expects for their selected Bourbon to result in their fund providing investors a 20% internal rate of return, over a 6 year span.

Bourbon vs. Whiskey

Terminology surrounding alcoholic beverages is not as simple as one would think.  For example,

  • Champagne is sparkling wine, but not all sparkling wine is Champagne.
  • Cognac is brandy, but not all brandy is Cognac.
  • Bourbon is whiskey, but not all whiskey is bourbon.

Confused yet?  Much of the subtleties surrounding terminology of these drinks is due to the region in which they are made, or subtle differences in composition.

With regards to Bourbon vs. Whiskey, there are a couple of key traits that distinguish the two from one another.  While Bourbon is indeed under the Whiskey family tree, it is a specific subset which can only be designated as such if the following parameters are met:

  • Made in the United States
  • 51% corn
  • Charred Oak barrels
  • No Additives
  • <160 proof upon distillation
  • Barreled at 125 proof
  • >80 proof upon bottling

If your ‘Bourbon’ doesn’t meet these parameters, you’re just drinking Whiskey.

Unique Assets

As the digital securities sector continues to grow, and more people become aware of what it is, we are seeing an increasing amount of unique asset classes getting attention.

While real estate and debt instruments remain quite popular, we have covered various alternate assets over the past year.  The following are just a few examples of this:

Basically, anything that is expected to either keep, or increase in, value over time, is now being given consideration for exposure through monitored funds.  Whiskey is simply the latest in this trend.

Wilderness Trail Distillery

Operating out of Danville, Kentucky, Wilderness Trails Distillery offers premium handcrafted spirits.  Their processes see their products distilled, aged, and bottled, on site.  These products cover a variety of taste buds, for those looking for anything from Bourbon, to Vodka, Rum, Rye, and more.

The company was founded by a pair of individuals; Pat Heist and Shane Baker.

Live Demonstration

While the bourbon to be tokenized in this fund is being provided by Wilderness Trail Distillery, the technical side of the process falls on the shoulders of, both, Wave and Vertalo.

As stated, these two companies have a history of working together.  In an effort to demonstrate what this working relationship is able to offer potential clients, the pair recently hosted a webinar.  In this live demonstration, the pair touched on the following, and more.

  • Onboarding cap tables
  • Tokenizing Assets
  • Choosing token providers

To learn more, and see first-hand just how easy the tokenization process has become, make sure to peruse the following article.

Vertalo Demonstrates Ease of Tokenization with Inaugural Webinar

Wave Financial

Founded in 2018, Wave Financial maintains operations in Los Angeles, California.  Here, they operate as an SEC Registered Investment Advisor (CRD# 305726).

Wave applies traditional investment strategies to digital assets and tokenized forms of real assets. Furthermore, they provide treasury management services and consultation to the digital asset ecosystem, alongside their digital asset fund products.

CEO, Dave Siemer, currently oversees company operations.

Spread the love

Joshua Stoner is a multi-faceted working professional. He has a great interest in the revolutionary 'blockchain' technology. In addition to this, he is a licenced Paramedic in Nova Scotia, Canada. As such, he can provide emergency care/medicine to any situation necessitating it.

Funds

Blockchain Capital’s BCAP Token Outperforms Market in Q2, 2020

mm

Published

on

Blockchain Capital's BCAP Token Outperforms Market in Q2, 2020

Blockchain Capital launched the first security token back in April 2017, this was to be the first tokenized venture fund. This STO event raised $10M USD.

Today they announced that the net asset value (“NAV”) of each BCAP token as of June 30th, 2020, is $4.47, based on the NAV of the underlying venture capital fund, Blockchain Capital III Digital Liquid Venture Fund, LP. Weekly NAV updates can be found at: http://www.loop.blockchain.capital/

The BCAP NAV finished up 25.6% for the second quarter of 2020. The Q2 increase was driven by the liquid/token portion of the fund’s portfolio. The NAV is up 22.8% year-to-date.

The BCAP portfolio is up 347.0% since inception, post-STO from April 2017, and has a Net IRR of 59.0%. Performance figures are net of all fees and estimated carry.

The composition of the portfolio as of June 30th, 2020 is as follows:

Blockchain Capital's BCAP Token Outperforms Market in Q2, 2020

While there are plenty of traditional cryptocurrencies in the portfolio, some special companies to note are Securitize and Harbor which are heavily involved in the digital securities and security tokens space.

Blockchain Capital's BCAP Token Outperforms Market in Q2, 2020

About Blockchain Capital

Blockchain Capital was founded in 2013 with the mission of helping entrepreneurs build world-class companies and projects based on blockchain technology – providing founders with the tools they need to succeed: capital, domain expertise, partnerships, recruiting and strategy.

Blockchain Capital is one of the earliest and most active venture investors in the blockchain industry and has financed 90+ companies and projects since its inception.  The company invests in both equity and tokens and is a multi-stage investor.  Blockchain Capital also pioneered the world’s first ever tokenized investment fund and by extension the blockchain industry’s very first security token, the BCAP, which the company sold through a security token offering in April of 2017.

The company’s view is that blockchain technology holds the promise to disrupt legacy businesses and create whole new markets and business models. Blockchain Capital believes its network of entrepreneurs, investors and advisors brings unrivaled resources to founders who want to leverage blockchain technology to change the world in profound ways.

 

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Blockchains

Real-World Assets as Collateral for DeFi, Made Possible with MakerDAO

mm

Published

on

Real-World Assets as Collateral for DeFi, Made Possible with MakerDAO

The cryptocurrency space was borne out of a desire to bring about a better financial system and infrastructure that is inclusive for anyone, anywhere.

The crypto industry has matured significantly since 2010 when Bitcoin kicked off a new wave that today spawned a whole new industry. The crypto community continually progressed with new tools and capabilities being gradually built up.

Nonetheless these capabilities that promise quicker settlement times, trustless global accessibility and granular asset control have mostly remained gated within the crypto realm.

Bringing Together Real-World and Crypto Assets

Now, the ambition is to bridge the gap between real-world assets and cryptocurrencies. Specifically in the DeFi space, that aims to provide a borderless financing infrastructure, the first steps are being made to bring real-world assets as collateral for loan issuance.

The community of MakerDAO, that is behind the DAI stablecoin, arguably one of the most popular DeFi projects, has confirmed the vote on whether to allow real-world assets to be included as collateral options.

This comes following the effort led by the startup Centrifuge, that developed a protocol that lets users turn real assets into securities against which ERC20 tokens can be issued. This enables real world asset securitization as these tokens are interest-bearing and will be issued as NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens).

DeFi applications built mostly on top of the Ethereum blockchain promise to give more people access to borrowing, lending, and other services because they eliminate the need to go and transact through a financial institution. 

In the case of MakerDAO, the system built with Maker (MKR) and DAI lets users deposit cryptocurrency-denominated collateral to take out loans denominated in the U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin DAI. 

While recently the DeFi space celebrated a huge milestone with $1 billion locked in various applications across the board, participation in DeFi today is limited because it requires that users have purely crypto-native assets.

Getting real-world assets involved in the DeFi industry is what Centrifuge is pursuing with its Ethereum Dapp called Tinlake. The app allows for the securitization of real-world assets and have these represented on the blockchain as tokens, which can in turn be used to gain access to DeFi services.

What is Asset Tokentization?

Asset tokenization refers to the act of turning the ownership of a real-world asset into a digital token. This can be done in various ways, but all result in the legally-upheld bridge between the physical asset and its representative token.

Deeds, titles, and certificates are all traditional versions of a token. A deed to a house represents ownership of that house. The token refers to the digitally native asset which represents the real-world asset itself.

 The first two types of assets that are available for tokenization are music streaming royalties enabled by PaperChain and ConsolFreight’s freight shipping invoices.

With the positive vote from the MakerDAO community, now anyone – be it individuals or companies – is able to utilize future cash flows from music streaming royalties or shipping invoices as collateral to take out loans for example.

Centrifuge’s Lucas Vogelsang notes the partnership could be the world’s first application of DeFi to a real-world business issue. Particularly, the solution helps ensure quick liquidity for artists and supply chain firms, without the hassles of going through traditional ways of financing. 

MakerDAO’s Rune Christensen has also shared a highly optimistic vision as the two proposals represent the first step towards the expansion of DeFi’s field of application:

“These should be seen as the first two [RWAs] in the greatest portfolio of assets that’s ever been built. It’s just the first step. Thousands and thousands of assets will exist alongside them.”

There are still issues and restrictions when it comes to securitization of real-world assets and introduces new risks to the DeFi space.

For instance, Centrifuge’s tokenization process through its app still falls under the securities law. Since both Paperchain and ConsolFreight are based in the U.S. only accredited investors will have access to these assets.

Another compromise that was made in order to bring real-world assets to DeFi is Centrifuge setting up a special purpose vehicle (SPV) that will have the assets associated with, from a legal touchpoint. Lenders, in the event of default, would have to rely on the legal system to enforce their rights to the collateral, rather than an automated smart contract that can do so with on-chain assets.

While this is necessary to have a claim for the tokenized real-world assets, it represents a single-point of failure. But this is a trade-off that Centrifuge’s Lucas Vogelsang says is necessary in order to bring real world assets on-chain.

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Security Tokens

Solving the Liquidity Puzzle for Security Tokens – Thought Leaders

mm

Published

on

Solving the Liquidity Puzzle for Security Tokens - Thought Leaders

There is a wide consensus in the financial industry that blockchain technology is going to disrupt the securities market. However, despite the claims, there is no double-digit annual growth of securities on blockchain, which would be expected from a disruptive technology. The reason for that are regulatory roadblocks that don’t allow delivering the biggest promise of digital securities – liquidity for previously illiquid securities. In this article we break down this problem and present a solution.

What are security tokens/digital securities?

From a legal perspective, security tokens are common securities and are subject to the same regulations. The difference is that records about securities ownership are stored on blockchain instead of paper-based or other forms of records. That’s why they are often called digital securities.

Innovative technology significantly improves operations with securities, making them digital and automated. In particular, transfer of digital securities is much easier and may happen in minutes or seconds instead of weeks, spent on signing physical contracts, doing compliance checks and updating government registers.

Why liquidity is so important for security tokens

Liquidity of an asset defines how easy it can be sold. For example, publicly listed securities are highly liquid, while real estate and startup equity are highly illiquid. Although security tokens have multiple advantages, greater liquidity is a principal one. For this reason, they often represent ownership in traditionally illiquid assets.

Mass adoption of security tokens first and foremost requires interest from investors, which will create incentives for businesses to issue digital securities instead of traditional ones. For investors, lack of liquidity is the biggest problem of securities that are not listed on exchanges as it makes investments in them riskier and makes investors wait for decades until they pay off. Therefore, unlocking liquidity of security tokens is crucial for their mass adoption.

Why is liquidity in the conventional meaning of the word is out of reach for security tokens

In the narrow sense of the world, securities are considered liquid if they are traded on a stock exchange. For this reason, lack of regulated secondary markets is considered the main limitation. However, this ignores the fact that there are already operating exchanges for security tokens: tZERO, Open Finance, MERJ, GSX – but very few tokens are listed there. Furthermore, Open Finance is on the edge of delisting all security tokens because their trading does not generate enough fees to support operations.

Therefore, the problem is not in the lack of marketplaces. It is in fact that listing on an exchange is overly complicated. It requires registering the offering at competent authorities, having minimum trading volume, minimum market cap, being under increased reporting requirements, which often include annual audit. Basically, it requires becoming a public company. These requirements will arise not only in the case of listing on a classical exchange but any kind of regulated market. This means that listing on a regulated trading venue is not feasible for most security token issuers.

Such a flawed understanding of the problem stems from crypto origins of security tokens. They were seen as a regulated continuation of utility tokens and cryptocurrencies, for which listing on exchange is much easier, so it became a synonym for liquidity. This myth should be debunked in order for the market to move to more realistic sources of liquidity.

How is liquidity for security tokens possible?

To answer this question, we need to go back to an original definition of liquidity, which is the ability to quickly sell assets at any moment. It has two main components: complexity of conducting the transaction and how easy it is to find a counterparty.

The former problem is solved by blockchain technology. Its main benefit for private securities is that it vastly simplifies conducting the securities transaction, making it possible to do everything online in a few minutes. Conventionally, transfer of securities would require signing physical agreements, reporting changes to the government register, settling a transaction via a wire transfer, and doing manual compliance checks on individuals engaged into the transaction.

Complexity of the transfer also impacts the number of potential counterparties. When the transfer is complicated and expensive, it becomes not feasible to transact small amounts. This cuts off smaller traders and investors from the market, making it even harder to find a counterparty.

The problem of finding a counterparty is traditionally solved by an order matching mechanism of exchanges, which for security tokens is not feasible. Therefore, the key to unlocking liquidity is in creating an efficient way to find counterparties for transactions that would not be considered a regulated market. 

This way is already known. It is a bulletin board for P2P transactions. As these transactions are private and do not involve an intermediary, they don’t require regulation. However, there are a number of nuances and requirements for such a venue not to be regulated, which will be covered in a separate article.

To the author’s knowledge, at the time of writing there is no venue that enables legally compliant and efficient P2P liquidity for security tokens.

What impact unlocking the liquidity of security tokens will have on capital markets?

Currently, venture investors may sell their shares only if businesses they invest into go public or are acquired. This has two implications, which both lead to money being used inefficiently and slow down the economic growth.

Firstly, it means that only businesses with the potential for IPO are worth investing. Businesses that can offer a solid yield but don’t offer “disruption” and outsized returns are deprived of funding. These are often businesses with a need for high capital investments – manufacturing, agriculture, physical infrastructure etc. The problem with a lack of capital investment is covered in a widely discussed article in Andreessen Horowitz blog “It’s time to build”.

Secondly, illiquidity makes VCs prioritize growth over profitability because when most investments don’t pay off even a 10x exit from successful ones may be not enough. It creates incentives to scale even when the business model is not tested enough, leading to extremely large companies, such as WeWork or Uber, struggling to deliver a profit.

The plague of private markets has impacts on public markets as well. It leads to the emergence of the IPO bubble, when more than 80% of newly public companies are not profitable. It is problematic because public securities are considered less risky, and thus fit into portfolios of retail funds and pension schemes, harming them by being overpriced.

Thus, solving the liquidity problem will have a drastic impact not only on the VC industry but on the entire economy.

Spread the love
Continue Reading