Connect with us

Regulation

Key Points from the Facebook Libra Senate Hearing

mm

Updated

 on

Facebook Libra Senate Hearing

Facebook’s Libra project took some heat on Capitol Hill last week as lawmakers took turns expressing concerns surrounding the project. Recently, Libra has been at the focal point of intense debates regarding the future of cryptocurrencies. Luckily, and for the first time in history, many of the lawmakers seem to be able to make a distinction between Libra and Bitcoin.

Facebook Defends Libra

Facebook Executive, David Marcus defended his company’s project in front of a packed Senate hearing on July 17th. Prior to his appearance, he released a prepared testimony in which he explains some of the finer points of Libra.

These points include the fact that the project is to be Swiss regulated. This approach makes sense because the Libra Association is based in Switzerland. Additionally, Swiss regulators welcome large cryptocurrency projects as part of the country’s strategy to remain a major financial hub throughout the digitization of the economy.

In addition to registering with the Swiss Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (FINMA), Marcus explained that the project will also be registered as a money service business with the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). While this approach sounds inclusive, lawmakers were not buying it.

Not an Easy Path

The overall tone of the hearing was one of distrust. It appeared as if the government felt threatened by the billion-dollar tech giant’s plans. Even more so, it seemed as if lawmakers were interested in seeing how they could accomplish a similar strategy.

No Rush

Marcus fielded question after question regarding a host of financial, regulatory, and privacy concerns. When confronted about specifics regarding how Libra intends to prevent illegal activity, Marcus was quick to let lawmakers know that the project has no intention of moving forward until all regulations are met.

David Marcus via The Independent

David Marcus via The Independent

This response did little to quell the fears of lawmakers. In the end, it appeared that Congress was still upset about Facebook’s past privacy breaches, and how that information could be used to influence Libra user’s actions. Basically, congress wants Facebook to be, well, less FaceBooky.

Meanwhile, the US Treasury department sounded alarms concerning the use of Libra by money launderers. To this extent, the Treasury wants Facebook to collect even more user information.

Crypto Educated

One of the most evident takeaways from the hearing was the fact that congress paints the Libra project with a much different brush than Bitcoin. For the first time, lawmakers asked extremely well-educated questions regarding the differences between Libra and other cryptocurrencies.

At one point, Warren Davidson, CoinShares Chief Strategist, was asked to explain the difference between “Bitcoin and Shitcoins.” This is a far cry from earlier cryptocurrency hearings in which lawmakers labeled crypto users as all dark web drug dealers that need to be squashed through intense regulations.

The highlight of the hearing is when Rep. Patrick McHenry stated “The world that Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned and others are building is an unstoppable force. We should not attempt to deter this innovation.”

Libra Gets Congress Thinking

Aside from being attached to Facebook, Libra doesn’t represent a huge technological shift in the market. For example, the consensus mechanism used for the crypto is the same one NEO utilized for the past four years. However, it really looks like Facebook has some serious enemies in Washington that are determined to push back against this project. Luckily, these developments may help lawmakers to see the true benefits of decentralized cryptos such as Bitcoin.

David Hamilton is a full-time journalist and a long-time bitcoinist. He specializes in writing articles on the blockchain. His articles have been published in multiple bitcoin publications including Bitcoinlightning.com

Newsletter Subscription

Advertiser Disclosure: Securities.io is committed to rigorous editorial standards to provide our readers with accurate reviews and ratings. We may receive compensation when you click on links to products we reviewed.

ESMA: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Investment advice disclaimer: The information contained on this website is provided for educational purposes, and does not constitute investment advice.

Trading Risk Disclaimer: There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities. Trading in any type of financial product including forex, CFDs, stocks, and cryptocurrencies.

This risk is higher with Cryptocurrencies due to markets being decentralized and non-regulated. You should be aware that you may lose a significant portion of your portfolio.

Securities.io is not a registered broker, analyst, or investment advisor.