Material Science
Rethinking Battery Design Assumptions
Securities.io maintains rigorous editorial standards and may receive compensation from reviewed links. We are not a registered investment adviser and this is not investment advice. Please view our affiliate disclosure.

New Understanding of Cathode Cracking in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Improving battery power density is a key driver for the adoption of EVs over internal combustion engines. Consumer safety is another major concern, though the public perception of fire risk often exceeds the reality.
Durability is equally critical. Buyers demand batteries that last over a decade—ideally outliving the vehicle itself—to preserve residual value and avoid costly replacements.
“Electrification of society needs everyone’s contribution. If people don’t trust batteries to be safe and long-lasting, they won’t choose to use them.”
To address these criteria, the industry is shifting from polycrystalline Ni-rich materials (PC-NMC) to single-crystal Ni-rich layered oxides (SC-NMC).
This transition aims to mitigate the nanoscopic strains that cause cathode cracking over time. Until now, the design of monocrystalline (single-crystal) cathodes followed the assumptions previously used for polycrystalline cathodes.
However, researchers at Argonne National Laboratory, Brookhaven National Laboratory, and the University of Chicago have discovered that these two cathode types crack in fundamentally different ways, paving the way for new optimization strategies.
They published their findings in Nature Nanotechnology1, titled “Nanoscopic strain evolution in single-crystal battery positive electrodes”.
New research shows single-crystal (monocrystalline) Ni-rich cathodes crack differently than older polycrystalline designs. Instead of cracks forming mainly along grain boundaries, strain can build within a single crystal as different regions react at different rates. This reframes how cathodes should be engineered to improve EV battery durability, safety, and long-term performance—especially as the industry seeks lower-cobalt (or cobalt-free) formulations.
Why Cathode Cracking Is a Primary Failure Mechanism
Swipe to scroll →
| Dimension | Polycrystalline Ni-rich Cathodes (PC-NMC) | Single-Crystal Ni-rich Cathodes (SC-NMC) |
|---|---|---|
| Microstructure | Particles composed of many smaller crystal grains with grain boundaries. | Particles are one continuous crystal with no internal grain boundaries. |
| Primary cracking pathway | Cracks initiate and propagate along grain boundaries as cycling expands/contracts grains. | Cracks driven by internal (intra-particle) strain gradients as regions react at different rates. |
| Strain origin | Mismatched expansion between adjacent grains and repeated mechanical fatigue. | Heterogeneous phase/chemical evolution within a single crystal causing localized stress. |
| Electrolyte interaction risk | Wide grain-boundary cracks can admit electrolyte, accelerating degradation. | Still vulnerable to surface/structural damage, but mechanism is less about grain-boundary ingress. |
| Composition design “rule of thumb” | Cobalt often used to mitigate Li/Ni disorder, but commonly associated with cracking trade-offs that require balancing. | Study suggests different composition requirements; manganese may be more mechanically detrimental while cobalt can improve durability. |
| Engineering levers | Grain-boundary strengthening, particle morphology control, coatings, electrolyte additives. | Reduce internal reaction-rate heterogeneity via chemistry tuning, coatings, gradients, particle processing, and cycling protocols. |
| Why it matters | Directly impacts capacity fade, impedance rise, and safety under aggressive cycling. | Shows SC designs aren’t just “PC without grain boundaries”—they need new optimization strategies for long-life, high-energy cells. |
Polycrystalline Cracking
In a polycrystalline cathode, the material is comprised of multiple nanoscopic crystals. As the battery charges and discharges, these particles expand and contract.
This repeated movement can widen the grain boundaries that separate the polycrystals, creating cracks. If a crack becomes too wide, electrolyte can infiltrate the particle—similar to how water freezing and thawing creates potholes in city streets.

Source: Nature
When this expansion exceeds elastic limits, the cathode cracks. At worst, this can lead to thermal runaway and fire. More commonly, it reduces the battery’s charge capacity over time, leading to performance degradation.
“Typically, it will suffer about five to 10% volume expansion or shrinkage. Once an expansion or shrinkage exceeds the elastic limits, it will lead to particle cracking.”
Jing Wang – Postdoctoral researcher at Argonne National Laboratory
Because monocrystalline cathodes lack boundaries between crystal grains, they do not suffer from this specific failure mode. However, battery degradation persists.
Monocrystalline Cathodes’ Unique Features
To investigate this, the researchers utilized multi-scale synchrotron X-ray techniques and a high-resolution transmission electron microscope.

Source: Nature
In a polycrystalline cathode, cobalt helps moderate Li/Ni disorder (nickel ions migrating into lithium layers) but is also a known contributor to cracking. Traditionally, manganese is added to balance this issue.
The Argonne researchers found that in monocrystalline cathodes, the opposite is true: manganese was more mechanically detrimental, while cobalt actually helped extend battery life.
“When people try to transition to single-crystal cathodes, they have been following similar design principles as the polycrystal ones.
Our work identifies that the major degradation mechanism of the single-crystal particles is different from the polycrystal ones, which leads to the different composition requirements.”
Jing Wang – Postdoctoral researcher at Argonne National Laboratory
The study reveals that reaction heterogeneity causes strain within individual crystals, rather than between them. Different regions of the crystal react at varying rates, creating internal stress that leads to cracking.

Source: Nature
How This Discovery Could Improve Next-Generation Batteries
Cobalt is more expensive than nickel or manganese and carries ethical production concerns, driving the industry’s push to reduce its use.
“By identifying this previously underappreciated mechanism, this work establishes a direct link between material composition and degradation pathways, providing deeper insight into the origins of performance decay in these materials.”
The next step is applying these findings to identify cobalt-free materials that reduce cracking risks while maintaining cost efficiency.
Conclusion
Improving the cathode is a vital step for enhancing lithium battery performance. This is particularly crucial for newer, anode-free designs where cathode efficiency is paramount.
This innovation provides a new theoretical framework for optimizing monocrystalline cathode designs. Ideally, it will lead to a cobalt-free alternative that significantly reduces cracking risks and lowers costs.
Such advancements are particularly valuable for cathode-agnostic battery developers like QuantumScape. Since their anode-free platform supports various cathode chemistries, they can rapidly integrate these resilient single-crystal designs to extend battery life without redesigning their core solid-state technology.
Battery Company
This study strengthens the thesis that materials-level durability is becoming a primary limiter of next-gen batteries. If single-crystal cathodes require different composition trade-offs than polycrystalline cathodes, suppliers and cell makers that can rapidly iterate cathode chemistry, coatings, and processing stand to gain.
For solid-state and anode-free approaches (e.g., QuantumScape), cathode reliability becomes even more central—creating potential upside for firms positioned to commercialize more resilient high-energy cathodes without sacrificing cost.
QuantumScape
QuantumScape Corporation (QS +3.27%)
A large segment of consumers remains doubtful of the range and recharging speeds of most EV models. The risk of fire from traditional lithium-ion batteries is also a concern.
Solid-state batteries offer an ideal solution by replacing the liquid electrolyte with a solid one, thereby eliminating fire risks and massively increasing energy density.
QuantumScape is particularly innovative for its anode-free design. This allows it to integrate multiple cathode materials, positioning the company to benefit from future improvements in cathode manufacturing and design.

Source: QuantumScape
After years of slow progress in labs, solid-state batteries are finally moving from promising prototypes to mass production and integration into commercial vehicles.
A key milestone was reached in 2025 when QuantumScape debuted its battery in the Ducati V21L electric motorcycle, a result of its partnership with Volkswagen.

Source: QuantumScape
QuantumScape’s design is significantly superior to lithium-ion batteries in almost all metrics:
- It can charge in just 15 minutes (10-80% at 45 ºC).
- The separator replacing the liquid electrolyte is nonflammable and noncombustible.
- Its battery cells’ energy density is 844 Wh/L and 301 Wh/kg.
- For reference, Tesla’s 4680 cells stand at 643 Wh/L and 241 Wh/kg, and BYD’s blade cells at ~375 Wh/L and 160 Wh/kg.
Volkswagen’s battery subsidiary, PowerCo, will provide QuantumScape up to $131 million in new payments over the next two years upon achieving certain milestones, demonstrating the group’s commitment to solid-state technology.
(You can read more about QuantumScape in our dedicated investment report.)
Latest QuantumScape (QS) Stock News and Developments
Insider Selling: QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) Director Sells $192,452.60 in Stock
Should You Buy QuantumScape While It's Below $9?
QuantumScape Stock Falls 20% In 5 Trading Sessions: What's Going On?
Could This $7 Stock Be Your Ticket to Millionaire Status?
What's Going On With QuantumScape Stock Today?
Will QuantumScape (QS) Stock Hit $10 in 2026?
Study Referenced
1. Wang, J., Liu, T., Huang, W. et al. Nanoscopic strain evolution in single-crystal battery positive electrodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02079-9









