The IoT security firm Atonomi faces a $25 million class-action lawsuit for failing to register their ICO with the SEC according to recent court documents filed in Washington State. Investors in the Atonomi platform claim that the firm misrepresented its progress and development team’s experience. Now, a Washington Court will determine the fate of these millions.
In 2018, Atonomi made headlines after securing $25 million in funding via an ICO. Since that time, the project has seen little development. Consequently, the value of the Atonomi token dropped by ninety-nine percent. As a result, investors are understandably upset and many feel as is they were scammed.
Luckily, there is some recourse due to the manner in which Atonomi hosted their ICO. Investors now claim the firm failed to register with either Washington State or the Feds. In the lawsuit, they seek a full refund of the $25 million raised from the ICO.
Discussing the matter via social media, an attorney familiar with the case, Stephen Palley, explained that Atonomi issued SAFT contracts to investors. A SAFT Contract (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) is an investment contract used by ICOs to meet federal and local regulations. When used, firms must register their crowdfunding event with the SEC. Not surprisingly, Atonomi failed to do so.
Hold Management Team Liable
The lawsuit seeks to hold the management team behind the Atonomi ICO financially and legally liable for losses. Robert Strickland is listed as the CEO of the firm. There are no public comments from the Atonomi team regarding the lawsuit.
Atonomi is a blockchain-base IoT (Internet of Things) security protocol. The platform enables IoT developers to embed identification and reputation solutions directly into their networks. Unfortunately, Atonomi failed to create a real use case for their token. This makes it’s token’s only use as an investment vehicle, which furthers the argument that the Atonomi Token is a tokenized security.
Security Token vs Utility
The SEC started cracking down on what they deem “illegal security offerings” in early 2018. Since then, a number of high profile cases emerged. These cases have gone in different directions. In the case of Ripple, the court found that the crypto had a true utility and therefore, was not a security token.
The SEC Chairman, Jay Clayton, deemed that Ethereum acted as a security during the crowdfunding phases of the operation but today is a utility token. They decided against pursuing the crypto for its initial crowdfunding breaches. While both of these cases sided with the ICO, there are many others that went in the opposite direction.
SEC on the Hunt
The Paragon Coin project is currently facing legal ramifications for offering securities illegally. In this instance, the celebrity promoters, the rapper The Game, and former Miss Iowa, Jessica VerSteeg, also face charges for their participation. The case signals increased prosecution for those assisting in the sales of illegal securities.
More to Come
You can expect to see more lawsuits regarding shady 2017 -2018 ICOs emerge. These investors are on the warpath after billions of dollars disappeared behind the smoke of the ICO rush. Atonomi seems to face an uphill battle. Their failure to register with the local authorities, combined with the lack of transparency regarding development, could result in a huge downfall for the firm.
- Dogecoin vs Bitcoin – Two Interesting Projects that are Vital to Crypto Adoption
- Securities.io & Draper Goren Holm’s Security Token Summit Partner To Educate Masses on Digital Securities
- Gold vs Platinum – Key Differences for Investors
- Stobox Looks to Accelerate Growth through Security Token Offering (STO)
- Forex Market Majors Trade Lower on Dollar Strength Awaiting Job Numbers