Connect with us

Regulation

BlockFi Issued ‘Cease and Desist’ Order Citing Securities Violations

mm

Published

 on

blockfi

Lately, service providers dealing with digital assets have become clear targets to regulators.  The most recent company to find itself in this situation is none other than the wildly popular BlockFi.

On July 19th, the New Jersey Bureau of Securities issued an order for BlockFi to cease offering ‘interest-bearing accounts (BIA)’.

Cease and Desist

This order, which requires BlockFi to stop accepting BIA clients based in New Jersey on July 22nd, specifically states that it was issued due to various securities violations.

Not only does are regulators within New Jersey viewing BIA as offering securities, they indicate that further violations have occurred due to a lack of transparency on the part of BlockFi.  More specifically, it feels the company not only fails to alert clientele sufficiently that accounts are not FDIC insured, but that it actively tries to route securities concerns to its own customer service department rather than regulators themselves.

Commentary

This situation has resulted in commentary from both sides, displaying an obvious discrepancy in interpretation of the law and/or services on offer.

Acting Attorney General, Andrew Bruck, states,

“Our rules are simple: if you sell securities in New Jersey, you need to comply with New Jersey’s securities laws…No one gets a free pass simply because they’re operating in the fast-evolving cryptocurrency market. Our Bureau of Securities will be monitoring this issue closely as we work to protect investors.”

BlockFi CEO, Zac Prince, states,

“BlockFi is engaged in an ongoing dialogue with regulators to help them understand our products, which we believe are lawful and appropriate for crypto market participants.  BIA is not a security, and we therefore disagree with the action by the New Jersey Bureau of Securities…We will continue to engage with all relevant authorities to protect our clients’ interests and ensure that our products remain available.”

Selectivity?

Perhaps part of the issue at hand is the lack of clarity as to why BlockFi’s interest-bearing accounts are deemed a securities violation.  Is it the promise of a return on investment? Or is it the supported coins/tokens?

BlockFi has been in operation for years, with a large presence at that.  The company has raised hundreds of millions in funding, and generated a substantial client-base.  The fact that this cease and desist order is only coming now may indicate that it was a recent change to BIA which prompted this action.  Perhaps the addition of new assets?

Once upon a time, centralized platforms were often quite selective with the coins/tokens they supported.  Clients clamoured for years to have Coinbase expand its support beyond a select few.  Times have changed though, and despite the increased attention by regulators, centralized platforms appear to be more comfortable with supporting a greater crop of assets.  BlockFi itself recently demonstrated this when it announced the inclusion of both Chainlink, and Uniswap.  While regulators have clearly deemed BTC and ETH as not being securities, the status of other assets is not as clear.

Binance

While trying times may be ahead for BlockFi, they will find company along the way.  Industry leading digital asset exchange, Binance, recently found themselves under fire for alleged securities violations as well.  This resulted in the company removing certain services from its platform – namely tokenized stocks in publicly listed companies.

With BlockFi having already restricted access to its BIA in certain states, a simple solution to the issue at hand may be to simply turn off access within New Jersey.

Joshua Stoner is a multi-faceted working professional. He has a great interest in the revolutionary 'blockchain' technology. In addition to this, he is a licenced Paramedic in Nova Scotia, Canada. As such, he can provide emergency care/medicine to any situation necessitating it.

Newsletter Subscription

Advertiser Disclosure: Securities.io is committed to rigorous editorial standards to provide our readers with accurate reviews and ratings. We may receive compensation when you click on links to products we reviewed.

ESMA: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Investment advice disclaimer: The information contained on this website is provided for educational purposes, and does not constitute investment advice.

Trading Risk Disclaimer: There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities. Trading in any type of financial product including forex, CFDs, stocks, and cryptocurrencies.

This risk is higher with Cryptocurrencies due to markets being decentralized and non-regulated. You should be aware that you may lose a significant portion of your portfolio.

Securities.io is not a registered broker, analyst, or investment advisor.