Connect with us

Regulation

Beijing Officials caution against Security Token Offerings

mm

Published

 on

Beijing Officials caution against Security Token Offerings

STOs…illegal?

In what is a first, a government body is now indicating that security token offerings are illegal. Commonly called STOs, these token offerings have seen a rise in popularity.  This has occured as the industry shifts away from ICOs. This shift has largely occurred due to the perceived STO adherence to regulations.

Chief of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Finance, Huo Xuewen, stated, “The ICO (initial coin offering) model is getting left behind for a new concept called STO. I want to issue a warning to anyone considering running an STO in Beijing…Don’t do it in Beijing – it is illegal. You can only engage in such activities with the approval from the government.”

While no other country has indicated thus far that STOs may be viewed as illegal, it is disconcerting that this may be the case in one of the world’s largest economies.

Beijing Municipal Bureau of Finance

This branch of government is tasked with various things. Among managing city expenditures, one such task is to ‘supervise the enforcement of financial and taxation guidelines, policies, laws and regulations’. With the expectation that enforcement of regulations will occur, it seems appropriate that the message discussed today should come from the BMBF.

2018 Global Wealth Management Forum

Held yearly, this gathering takes place as an open forum where the BMBF discusses wealth management. Discussions deal with regulations, future plans, expenditures, etc., with regards to Beijing. It is on this stage that the Chief of the BMBF, Huo Xuewen, spoke on the status of STOs.

This year’s iteration took place on December 1. The full transcript of the Xuewen speech can be found HERE.

Nothing New

In all reality, this announcement by Beijing should come as no surprise. Over the past 2 years, the city has made the news various times in their attempt to stifle the blockchain industry.

Beginning in September of 2017, Beijing was one of the first regions to ban ICOs altogether. A ban that remains to this day.

Beyond the ICO ban, we have seen Beijing enforce various regulations.  These restrict business within the city from promoting/hosting/displaying anything related to cryptocurrencies.

With actions such as these having already taken place, a continuation of this trend should be expected. It is reassuring, however, that despite the Beijing government attempting to stifle the industry, it continues to thrive. This resistance to outside control is often cited as a main ideological draw for many towards blockchain and its various sectors.

In Denial?

Actions such as these may bring worry to some, as we ask the question ‘are we in denial?’ Is this something that may occur outside of China? Thankfully, no. Although the legality of ICOs can sometimes be called into question, STOs have shown no indication of backlash from other governments. Although this news may be bad for those in Beijing, it should have no effect on the rapid development of digital security related services and offerings. The only thing this will accomplish is triggering an exodus of talent and companies from the region to more friendly climates.

Spread the love

Joshua Stoner is a multi-faceted working professional. He has a great interest in the revolutionary 'blockchain' technology. In addition to this, he is a licenced Paramedic in Nova Scotia, Canada. As such, he can provide emergency care/medicine to any situation necessitating it.

Regulation

Blockstation Joins the IIROC

mm

Published

on

Blockstation Joins the IIROC

The tokenization platform, Blockstation announced on Oct 31, that it will accept a leadership role in the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada – IIROC. The news showcases a push for more regulations in the Canadian security token sector, as well as, stronger positioning of Blockstation in the market.

The IIROC is a Canadian self-regulatory body created to help further development in the security token sector. The group’s primary focuses include broker-dealers, trading, and the institution of Universal Market Integrity Rules (UMIR).

IIROC Members

The IIROC includes a huge variety of professionals from various parts of the industry. As such, the group provides a rare opportunity for regulators to collaborate with leading financial, legal, and technological institutions across Canada.

Blockstation via Twitter

Blockstation via Twitter

Currently, the group includes regulators, crypto firms, law firms, and three of the largest banks in the country. Specifically, the Crypto-Asset Working Group members are:

  • Stephen Allcock (Questrade Financial Group)
  • Pam Draper (Bitvo)
  • Robin Ford (Robin Ford Consulting)
  • Andrew Grovestine (Canadian Securities Exchange)
  • François Lavallée (National Bank Financial)
  • Julie Mansi (Borden Ladner Gervais LLP)
  • Felix Mazer (Coinsquare)
  • Linda Montgomery (Coinchange Financial/Blockstation)
  • Brian Mosoff (Ether Capital Corp.)
  • Souvik Mukherjee (Scotia Wealth Management)
  • Laurence Rose (Omega Securities Inc./ 4C Clearing Corporation)
  • Duncan Rule (CIBC)
  • Phil Sham (Aquanow)
  • Sean Shore (Canadian Compliance & Regulatory Law)
  • Paul Stapleton (Fidelity Clearing Canada)
  • Dino Verbrugge (DV Trading LLC)
  • Joseph Weinberg (Paycase Financial)
  • Robert Whitaker (Blockchain Intelligence Group)
  • Lara Wojahn (Dominion Bitcoin Mining Company Ltd.)

Robust Development

One of the main goals of IIROC is to develop a regulatory framework that supports a robust, thriving digital asset marketplace to further drive innovation in the space. Additionally, the body seeks to integrate more consumer and investor protections in the market.

Blockstation Joins the Team

Blockstation received an invitation to participate in the IIROC after the group recognized the firm as an industry leader in the region. Importantly, Blockstation has experience working with regulators in other jurisdictions to develop its platform.

Today, Blockstation operates a fully compliant tokenization platform. The services provided by the firm include an end-to-end solution for listing, tokenizing, trading, custodianship, clearing and settlement, and lifecycle management of tokenized assets. Specifically, the firm’s Marketing Advisor Linda Montgomery will lend her experience to the IIROC.

Blockstation Makes Headlines

Notably, Blockstation made headlines this week after the announcement that the firm will host a compliant digital securities ecosystem via the Jamaica Stock Exchange (JSE). This limited pilot will test the trading of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) according to an April 3, press release.

Jamaica Stock Exchange

The JSE first announced its crypto aspirations back in August. At that time, the JSE signed a master agreement with Blockstation. For its part, Blockstation would develop the tools for the trading of digital assets and security tokens on the JSE.

Blockstation Making Waves

Blockstation is a true pioneer in the Canadian crypto space. Now the firm seeks to help develop the fledgling STO sector into a major FinTech market. You can expect to hear more from these exciting developers as their JSE project continues. For now, Canada looks to be ready to take the next steps in blockchain adoption.

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Regulation

Veritaseum Hit with $8 Million in SEC Fines

mm

Published

on

Veritaseum Hit with $8 Million in SEC Fines

In another example of the SEC turning up the heat on firms, the regulatory body hit Veritaseum and its CEO with hefty fines. Veritaseum had been embroiled in an SEC trial since earlier in the year. The SEC alleged the firm illegally sold securities to investors. Now the company must pay $8 million in fines and judgments as part of its retribution.

As previously reported, Veritaseum LLC, its CEO Reggie Middleton, and a sister firm, registered in NY, Veritaseum Inc. faced serious scrutiny from the SEC for its 2017 – 2018 ICO. During the unregistered coin offering, the firm secured $14.8 million in funding from investors.

Veritaseum Complaints

By mid-2018, the SEC received numerous complaints of fraudulent activity on the part of Mr. Middleton. For example, the SEC report alleged Middleton downplayed the risks involved in the investment. Additionally, he misrepresented the tokens his company offered.

Tokens are not Coupons

On multiple occasions, he referred to the tokens as securities or software. The report states that at least on one occasion, he told investors the tokens were similar to gift cards.

Hacking Incident

On top of the troubling miss information campaign, Veritaseum had other shady incidents occur during its now controversial ICO. According to Middleton, the company was the victim of a hacker that stole $8 million from funds raised. Of course, these funds were never recovered. Consequently, the incident added to the black cloud accumulating over the Veritaseum camp.

Veritaseum via CoinMarketCap

Veritaseum via CoinMarketCap

SEC Responds

In August of this year, the SEC responded to investor complaints. The regulatory body sent Middleton a cease-and-desist. As part of the complaint, Middleton’s ability to host an ICO or operate his firms was put on freeze.

SEC Enters Talks

The SEC entered official settlement talks with Veritaseum on OCT 9. This decision followed a postponement of the original trial date until Nov. 14, 2019, by the New York Eastern District Court.

According to reports, Veritaseum must now pay $8.4 million in disgorgement fines. Of these fines, $7,891,600.00 goes to defendant liabilities. Additionally, the company is liable for a civil penalty of up to $1 million and a prejudgment interest amount of $582,535.

Veritaseum Hit Hard

The news hit Veritaseum’s market value hard. Since the start of the trial, Veritaseum lost around 35% of its value. The token fell from around $25 per coin to $15, before rebounding slightly to $18.71.

SEC on the War Path

The SEC has been on a mission to crack down on ICOs from the 2017 crypto craze. Regulators already hit Sia with a $225,000 for its 2017 ICO in which the firm raised $120,000. EOS is another example of the SEC crackdown. The company must pay $24 million for its $4.1 billion 2017 ICO. While both firms faced charges for illegally selling securities, neither had such significant misrepresentation claims put against them as Veritaseum.

Veritaseum is Unique

In this manner, Veritaseum is significant. The firm is still operating but Middleton is no longer able to conduct blockchain crowdfunding ventures. It’s hard to say exactly what the long term effects of the settlement will be. For now, the crypto community must watch and wait patiently to see the results.

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Regulation

Harbor Approved by SEC as Transfer Agent

mm

Published

on

Harbor Approved by SEC as Transfer Agent

Broker Dealer

Harbor, a tokenization platform, has recently announced that they have successfully been awarded a ‘transfer agent’ licence by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This new role will allow Harbor to act as a regulated financial bookkeeper. More specifically, this role “…involves recording transactional data, including asset ownership, and more.  Transfer Agents are typically utilized by companies which have issued some form of security.”

Multiple Licenses

This development caps off a productive few months, which also saw Harbor become a registered broker/dealer.

With these two new designations bestowed upon them, the company gains a significant amount of flexibility in the services which they can offer clientele. In a nascent industry, in which most companies are battling to establish themselves, this flexibility should prove to be a major boon to Harbor.

Harbor CEO, Josh Stein, commented on the need of companies within the digital securities sector, and how Harbor is doing their part to help them.

“…companies need solutions to compliantly manage the investment lifecycle, which includes working with licensed broker-dealers and registered transfer agents…Harbor provides these services along with a common technology platform that integrates compliance and custody and enables the traditional private capital ecosystem of issuers, broker-dealers and placement agents.”

Reg A+

While there may be various reasons as to why Harbor applied to become a transfer agent, the ability to offer Reg A+ investment opportunities ranks at the top of their list.

Harbor CEO, Josh Stein, had the following to say on the importance of this type of structuring.

Reg. A is really a sweet spot for many companies looking to raise capital, including blockchain companies wanting to get their tokens into the hands of a broad user base and offer potential for liquidity from day one.”

Investment opportunities operating under Reg. A+ are unique in their flexibility, as they are open to, not only accredited, but retail investors alike. Furthermore, they allow for a company to raise as much as $50M in a capital generation event. The main caveat is that a transfer agent is required to oversee the process in order to remain compliant – a title that Harbor now holds.

Harbor

A United States based company, Harbor, specializes as a tokenization platform. The company, which was founded in 2017, currently sees its operations spearheaded by CEO, Josh Stein.

In the time since their launch, Harbor has contributed more than most, to the digital securities sector. A few of these contributions include, not only the development of a specialized token standard for digital securities (R-Token), but the facilitating the tokenization of large real estate funds.

In Other News

For those interested in learning about industry competitors holding similar licensing to Harbor, make sure to read the following article. Here, we briefly discuss, not only the roles associated with these titles, but companies which hold them.

Titles and Designations among Industry Participants

Spread the love
Continue Reading